Nicholas B. Jackson


McCain’s Tax Breaks

According to an article in Harper’s by Ken Silverstein published this morning, $950,000 of the $950,100 contributed to the John and Cindy McCain Foundation between 2001 and 2006, or 99.99%, came from John McCain himself.

During those same years, the Foundation gave $1.6 million to various organizations. Nearly a third of that–more than $500,000–went to elite private schools attended by the McCain children. Collectively, the schools are the largest recipient of donations from the Foundation; the largest individual recipient was the U.S. Naval Academy Foundation.

McCain has four children with Cindy, all of whom attended prep schools in Arizona. Meghan McCain, McCain’s eldest child from his current marriage, went to Xavier College Preparatory. McCain’s foundation has given about $50,000 to the school, mostly during Meghan’s years there. Donations to Xavier have dropped off since Meghan graduated (in 2003 or 2004) and went on to Columbia University. For 2006, the foundation cut Xavier a check for just $250.



Ludicrous, Convoluted And Downright Screwy

The New Republic has posted a primer to the Texas primary-caucus hybrid–the electoral equivalent, they say, to a turducken–that they are calling ‘Everything You Need To Know About Texas’s (Ludicrous, Convoluted, and Downright Screwy) Tuesday Primary.’

Some statistical highlights:

In-state fundraising through February 28:
Clinton: $4.9 million
Obama: $3.6 million

Demographics of Democratic primary voters in Texas:
Hispanic: 37.1%
Black: 22%
White: 38.1%
Female: 51.9%, Male: 48.1%
29 and under: 11%
65 and over: 26.1%
Union members: 476,000

Latest polls:
Rasmussen (Feb. 27): Obama 48; Clinton 44
InsiderAdvantage (Feb. 27): Obama 43; Clinton 47
SurveyUSA (Feb. 25): Obama 49; Clinton 45
CNN (Feb. 24): Obama 50; Clinton 46

The article also goes on to explain why the hybrid system exists and how the individual primary and caucus voting systems work as well as where the majority of the delegates awarded from Texas are coming from.



Obama Goes For The Gay Vote
February 28, 2008, 10:28 pm
Filed under: Blog, Politics, Texas Monthly | Tags: , , , , , , ,

Obama Ad; Obama 2008People don’t talk about it as often as the latino vote or the female vote, but it is widely believed that Clinton has been holding onto the majority of the gay vote since the beginning. With her numbers slipping in the polls and Obama’s 11 straight victories, his campaign is now focusing on that demographic which may put him on top of his opponent for the March 4th primaries: the gays.

Today, Obama placed the below ad in several gay newspapers in Ohio and Texas. His campaign also released an open letter to the gay community in which Obama touted his support for passage of the Matthew Shepard Hate Crimes Act and denounced the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell policy. Passages from the letter:

In the U.S. Senate, I have co-sponsored bills that would equalize tax treatment for same-sex couples and provide benefits to domestic partners of federal employees. And as president, I will place the weight of my administration behind the enactment of the Matthew Shepard Act to outlaw hate crimes and a fully inclusive Employment Non-Discrimination Act to outlaw workplace discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity.

Unlike Senator Clinton, I support the complete repeal of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) — a position I have held since before arriving in the U.S. Senate. While some say we should repeal only part of the law, I believe we should get rid of that statute altogether. Federal law should not discriminate in any way against gay and lesbian couples, which is precisely what DOMA does.



Most Influential Liberals

Back in November, The Daily Telegraph released their comprehensive list of the 100 most influential liberals and 100 most influential conservatives in America. The list generated a lot of response–both positive and negative. (The Governator in the top 20 list for liberals? At least Michael Barone, a columnist for U.S. News & World Report–and the 87th most influential conservative according to the list–acknowledged that legitimate arguments were made for what he would consider “eccentric” choices) While you may disagree with the rankings, I thought it would be interesting to see what each of the top 10 had to say about our current candidates.

1. BILL CLINTON (Former U.S. president)

A peerless tactician, huge intellect and natural communicator, Bill Clinton was one of the great retail politicians of the 20th century.

On OBAMA: You said in 2004 you didn’t know how you would have voted on the resolution, you said in 2004 there was no difference between you and George Bush on the war, and you took that speech you’re now running on off your Web site in 2004, and there’s no difference in your voting record and Hillary’s ever since. Give me a break. This whole thing is the biggest fairytale I’ve ever seen.

On CLINTON: We have a future out there that could be the most glorious, peaceful prosperous time in human history, or it could be more unraveling, growing more unequal at home and more isolated from the rest of the world. She is the best person to take us in the right direction.

2. AL GORE (Environmental campaigner)

His often lonely quest to spread apocalyptic warnings about climate change and the future of the planet has led to an unlikely celebrity, an Oscar for a documentary about him and, this month, the Nobel Peace Prize.

Former Vice President Al Gore has been careful not to endorse either candidate. When the media frenzy started to die down that he might toss his own hat into the race (over 200,000 people have signed a petition asking him to run), the focus shifted to who he would endorse instead. The general consensus seems to be that he would endorse Obama, but has kept from doing so just in case Clinton wins the nomination and then, the White House. With a Nobel Prize and an Academy Award under his belt and more attention than he has ever received in the past, this will be the term for Gore to make a significant impact on climate control legislation and he has refrained from burning any bridges.

3. MARK PENN (Political strategist)

As the chief adviser to Hillary Clinton and global CEO of the public relations firm Burson-Marsteller, Penn has the world at his feet. Pollster and strategist for Bill Clinton’s 1996 re-election campaign, he has worked for the former First Lady since her Senate victory in 2000. He has also advised Bill Gates’s Microsoft and Tony Blair.

On OBAMA: On a conference call with reporters just now, Hillary pollster Mark Penn sought to make the case for her electability by dredging up bad memories of the GOP and right-wing media’s successful efforts to redefine Al Gore and John Kerry, arguing that Hillary wouldn’t succumb to such tactics … Penn said that Hillary has “withstood” this process, while Obama would find that his independent support “would evaporate relatively quickly once he faced the Republicans.” Penn added that the GOP “is already playing the national security card against Obama.”

4. HILLARY CLINTON (Senator for New York and presidential candidate)

Could this woman be the 44th U.S. president? At the time of writing, she appears the odds-on favourite, although a shrill and defensive debate performance and an unwillingness to commit herself on the smallest of issues betray alarming chinks in her armour.

On OBAMA: Maybe I’ve just lived a little long, but I have no illusions about how hard this is going to be. You are not going to wave a magic wand and have the special interests disappear.

5. NANCY PELOSI (Speaker of the House of Representatives)

The mother of five and grandmother of six, she became the first female Speaker and is third in line to the presidency after Vice President Dick Cheney.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi has, like Gore, decided not to endorse either candidate. A spokesman told TIME back in January: “Speaker Pelosi is chair of the Democratic Convention and has decided not to endorse any of the candidates. She is thrilled with the enthusiastic Democratic turnout in Iowa and New Hampshire and expects it to build in upcoming primaries. The country is clearly ready for a New Direction, and the Speaker looks forward to working with a Democrat in the White House and having a bigger Democratic majority in Congress next year.”

However, Arianna Huffington–another lister–has written that Pelosi is “leaning toward Obama” and much talk has been made about California congressman George Miller’s endorsement of Obama. According to MSNBC, “this is perhaps the closest thing to getting a Nancy Pelosi endorsement as you can come without actually getting it. Miller is incredibly close with her politically. He wouldn’t be doing this without her consent of sorts.”

6. BARACK OBAMA (Senator for Illinois and presidential candidate)

Burst on to the national scene with a powerful speech at the 2004 Democratic Convention and mounted an audacious bid for the presidency this year after just two years in the Senate. An inspirational figure with two beautifully-written volumes of biography under his belt, Obama still has a chance of becoming America’s first black president.

On CLINTON: Ten years after NAFTA passed, Sen. Clinton said it was good for America. … Well, I don’t think NAFTA has been good for America – and I never have. The fact is, she was saying great things about NAFTA until she started running for President.

7. MICHAEL MOORE (Filmmaker)

Moore’s polemical 2002 documentary Fahrenheit 9/11 sealed his position as the Right’s public enemy number one after previously attacking the gun lobby with his Bowling for Columbine. No figure is more likely to send a Right-winger into apoplexy than the university dropout from Flint, Michigan who supported Ralph Nader in the 2000 election.

Back in January, Michael Moore wasn’t saying the best things about any of the candidates (see below). But, then again, who does he like? Apparently John Edwards. (On EDWARDS: Edwards is the only one of the three front-runners who has a universal health care plan that will lead to the single-payer kind all other civilized countries have. His plan doesn’t go as fast as I would like, but he is the only one who has correctly pointed out that the health insurance companies are the enemy and should not have a seat at the table.) But he refrained from endorsing any candidate. Now that we’re down to the final two Moore said on Larry King in early February that he is “morally prohibited from voting for Hillary in the primaries because of her war votes.”

On OBAMA: Senator Obama has a big heart, and that heart is in the right place. Is he electable? Will more than 50% of America vote for him? We’d like to believe they would. We’d like to believe America has changed, wouldn’t we? Obama lets us feel better about ourselves — and as we look out the window at the guy snowplowing his driveway across the street, we want to believe he’s changed, too. But are we dreaming?

On CLINTON: I have a theory: Hillary knows the sexist country we still live in and that one of the reasons the public, in the past, would never consider a woman as president is because she would also be commander in chief. The majority of Americans were concerned that a woman would not be as likely to go to war as a man (horror of horrors!). So, in order to placate that mindset, perhaps she believed she had to be as “tough” as a man, she had to be willing to push The Button if necessary, and give the generals whatever they wanted. If this is, in fact, what has motivated her pro-war votes, then this would truly make her a scary first-term president.

8. ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER (Governor of California)

Leaving him off the conservative list was a difficult decision but Schwarzenegger’s defiance of Republican orthodoxy and move towards California liberalism leaves him better placed to influence the liberal sphere.

On OBAMA: California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, weighing in on the presidential race, said that both Republican presidential candidate John McCain and Democrat Barack Obama are on the right track in “talking about bringing people together” across partisan lines…

On CLINTON: In an interview with Politico last year, Schwarzenegger said he thinks Democrats should stop criticizing Hillary Clinton for refusing to say she made a mistake by voting for the Iraq war.

9. OPRAH WINFREY (Television talk show host)

Very possibly the most influential woman in the world, Oprah – her first name is her trademark – has become a huge franchise, including not just her eponymous television show but a radio show, magazine and book club.

On OBAMA: For the first time in my life, I feel compelled to stand up and speak for the man that I believe has a new vision for America. I am not here to tell you what to think. I am here to ask you to think, seriously.

10. EVAN BAYH (Senator for Indiana)

Clever, personable and centrist former governor of a red state, Bayh’s 2008 presidential bid showed much promise before he dropped out early on calculating that Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama were just too strong for him.

On CLINTON: I have seen firsthand how effective she is interacting with global leaders and the respect she commands. I believe that her approach to our national security challenges will be strong but also more effective, because it will be more thoughtful and comprehensive than the current administration’s. Senator Clinton is both tough and smart.



Being Independent Is Being Texas
February 28, 2008, 2:37 pm
Filed under: Blog, Politics, Texas Monthly | Tags: , , , , , ,

Mike Huckabee has found enough change in his couch cushions to purchase some ad time in Texas. Watch his latest TV commercial below:



Chicago Spire to Reach New Heights

Chicago Spire; (C) Santiago CalatravaThe economy is crumbling. People are worried about a recession. The housing market is dead. And, with the arrogance that Chicago has often been known for, @properties, a real estate firm, opened the main sales office for the planned Chicago Spire last month, hoping to sell an unprecedented amount of luxury real estate.

With the massive Trump International Hotel & Tower nearing completion on the river and several other condominium units reaching for the skies, there is no shortage of high-end living spaces in and around the Second City right now. Yet, preliminary construction began on Santiago Calatrava’s Chicago Spire in mid-2007 and is expected to be completed by 2011. In the three years between now and then, @properties is hoping to sell out what will be the tallest residential building in the world when the last plate is welded on approximately 2,000 feet above the sidewalk. The tower will also become the tallest building anywhere in North America, dwarfing Toronto’s CN Tower.

The Spire will house about 1,200 units, including a two-story, 10,000 square-foot penthouse that is on the market for $40 million, or $4,000 per square foot, more than any condominium has ever sold for in the city, according to a recent article in The Chicago Tribune. It appears as though “low-end” 500 square-foot studios will run in the $750,000 range.

Garrett Kelleher, the building’s developer, attributes the record-breaking pricing to the large influence of the designer, Calatrava, on the building. It has yet to be seen how many of the condominiums will pre-sell in the coming months. We do know, however, that the Spire is getting a lot of international media attention and the hype is building. For example, the global sales campaign launched in Dublin this week where it is reported that more than 1,000 people turned out to the four-day exhibition.

“The initial response from the global community has been overwhelming,” said Dominic Grace, Head of Savills Residential Development and leader of the global sales campaign. “Our sales team has been busy writing contracts every day. There is simply nothing like The Chicago Spire anywhere else in the world, and the privilege to live in a residence of its significance is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity.”



The Zaha Hadid Plan: Working Backwards (There’s Hope For Me Still)

Vitra Fire StationThis past June when I walked into the Chicago offices of Encyclopaedia Britannica to begin my stint as an editorial intern, I knew little about the company. I was a wide-eyed college student majoring in magazine journalism (I still am), doubting that a career with a magazine was my life’s calling (I still doubt) and trying to gain some experience in other forms of media and publishing.

As a high school student I had dreamed of reading the entire set from cover to cover. I thought that if only I could retain just a fraction of what I read (a la A. J. Jacobs in The Know-It-All), it would help me in everything I would encounter in life. Other projects managed to get in the way, and, in fact, still continue to get in the way. I imagine I won’t have the time to read a complete set until I’m retired and for that I’ll need a new reason. I’m going to do things backwards.

One of the few things I did know—thanks to my extensive Googling—was that Zaha Hadid held a position on the Editorial Board of Advisors with several well-known intellectuals, university presidents and distinguished prize winners. (Ever heard of the Nobel and Pulitzer?) As if this did me any good. As if the advisors to Britannica regularly make rounds of the office, giving pep talks on the future of the encyclopaedia and the importance of truth in editorial. As if I’d meet her, she’d fall instantly under my spell and get me a job after college.

It’s unknown to me when she joined the board, but I imagine it was, in part, a result of the Pritzker Prize she was awarded in 2004. Widely considered architecture’s equivalent of the Nobel, Hadid was the first—and still the only—female to snag the prize. Before that point in her career I dare say she was relatively unknown outside of the architectural community, having few constructed pieces connected to her name. The majority of her work was either still on paper or done in the classrooms; she had held several positions at major universities around the world. Britannica loves its intellectuals, and Hadid’s work at Harvard, Columbia, and other prestigious institutions must have had some sway.

A loss to Britannica, a gain for the rest of the world, Hadid has since left her post on the Board of Advisors and has been making dents all over the news this past week.

The New York Times reported that the Baghdad-born, London-based architect will be designing the new Art Museum on the Michigan State University campus in East Lansing. Building Design Online wrote that the architect known for bold, unconventional forms is working on an extension to Oxford’s St. Anthony’s College. Archinect, Time, Architectural Record and others all reported similar stories. Oh, and she’s also overseeing the 20-year construction of her radical island plan next to Bilbao, Spain, that will host 6,000 homes and more. All of this while working extensively on building plans for the up-and-coming Dubai with Frank Gehry, Jean Nouvel and Tadao Ando, arguably the three most famous living architects. Some say that Hadid deserves to be a member of that exclusive club; one of the most famous living architects.

And she did it all in the past few years. She did it all backwards. Now, at 57, Hadid is just beginning the career—in earnest—of an award-winning architect. Maybe there is still some hope for my way of doing things after all.